short hairpin rna shrna sequence (Addgene inc)
Structured Review

Short Hairpin Rna Shrna Sequence, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1377 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/short hairpin rna shrna sequence/product/Addgene inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1377 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Cognitive and Synaptic Impairment Induced by Deficiency of Autism Risk Gene Smarcc2 and its Rescue by Histone Deacetylase Inhibition"
Article Title: Cognitive and Synaptic Impairment Induced by Deficiency of Autism Risk Gene Smarcc2 and its Rescue by Histone Deacetylase Inhibition
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.1101/2025.05.29.656867
Figure Legend Snippet: (a) Bar graphs showing Smarcc2 mRNA levels in N2A cells transfected with control vs. Smarcc2 shRNA. n=15-16 cultures/group; t 29 =20.3, p <0.001, unpaired t test. (b) Representative low-magnification (2×) image showing the AAV injection site and bar graphs displaying Smarcc2 mRNA and protein levels in mouse PFC injected with control vs. Smarcc2 shRNA AAV. Inset: immunoblots of Smarcc2 and Histone H3. mRNA: n=12-15 mice/group; t 25 =4.78, p <0.001. Protein: n=9-11 mice/group; t 18 =5.9, p <0.001. Scale bars: 0.5 mm. (c) Representative confocal images (63×) showing immunostaining of Smarcc2 (red) and NeuN (blue). Scale bars: 20 μm. (d) Quantification of the fluorescence intensity of Samrcc2 and the number of NeuN+ cells. n=9-12 images/3-4 mice/ group. Smarcc2 intensity: t 19 =7.4, p <0.001, unpaired t test. (e) Plot showing the percentage of correct responses in various trials of spontaneous T-maze tests of control vs. Smarcc2 KD mice. n=31-41 mice/group. p <0.001, unpaired t test; (f) Bar graphs showing the spatial memory index and latency to the correct hole in Barnes Maze (BM) tests of control vs. Smarcc2 KD female mice. n=15-16 mice/group. Index: p =0.03, M-W test; latency: t 23.6 =3.26, p =0.034, Welch’s t test. (g) Bar graphs showing the social preference index and time spent on social (Soc) and non-social (NS) objects in three-chamber social preference tests of control vs. Smarcc2 KD mice. n=22-27 mice/group. Time: F 1,94 =147.5, ### p <0.001, Soc vs. NS, two-way ANOVA. (h) Bar graphs showing the time spent in light box and the number of entries into the light box in light-dark box tests of control vs. Smarcc2 KD mice. n=12-15 mice/group. (i) Bar graphs showing the time in open arms and number of entries into open arms in elevated plus maze (EPM) tests of control vs. Smarcc2 KD mice. n=24-31 mice/group. (j) Bar graphs showing time spent in the center area of open field, the number of entries to center area, and the total distance traveled in open field (OF) tests of control vs. Smarcc2 KD mice. n=18-22 mice/group. (k) Bar graph showing the grooming time in grooming tests of control vs. Smarcc2 KD mice. n=10-14 mice/group. (l) Bar graphs showing the number and time of aggressive encounters and total interactions in resident-intruder (RI) tests of control vs. Smarcc2 KD mice. n=9-12 mice/group. All data are shown as mean ± SEM, * p <0.05, *** p <0.001.
Techniques Used: Transfection, Control, shRNA, Injection, Western Blot, Immunostaining, Fluorescence
Figure Legend Snippet: (a, b) Bar graphs showing the level of H3K9ac, H3K27ac, H3K27me3, and H3K4me3 in N2A cells transfected with control vs. Smarcc2 shRNA (a) or PFC tissue from mice injected with control vs. Smarcc2 shRNA AAV (b). a, n=6-7 cultures/group, H3K9ac: t 12 =5.5, p <0.001; H3K27ac: t 10 =3.3, p =0.008; b, n=9-11 mice/group, H3K9ac: t 18 =5.3, p <0.001; H3K27ac: t 16 =2.7, p =0.016. (c) Representative immunoblots of co-IP experiments showing HDAC2-bound Smarcc2 in control vs. Smarcc2 KD mice. Anti-HDAC2 was used for IP, anti-Smarcc2, anti-HDAC2 and anti-HDAC1 was used for blotting. No antibody and IgG were used as negative controls for IP. (d) Diagram showing H3K9ac occupancy at Slc1a3, Slc6a1, and Slc32a1 promotor regions, including the location of primers used in ChIP-PCR assays (light blue rectangular area). (e) ChIP assay data showing differential H3K9ac levels at Slc1a3, Slc6a1 and Slc32a1 promoters in the PFC of control vs. Smarcc2 KD mice. n=3-6 mice/group. Slc1a3 : t 15 =3.5, p =0.003; Slc6a1 : t 6 =3.8, p =0.009; Slc32a1 : t 5 =3.2, p =0.02, unpaired t test. All data are shown as mean ± SEM. * p <0.05, ** p <0.01, *** p <0.001.
Techniques Used: Transfection, Control, shRNA, Injection, Western Blot, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay
